Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
I've long been of the opinion that the moon is just the back of the sun.
Pot had helped
Get the fuck over it.
Read the FAQ and lurk more.
The conspiracy has made it impossible to adequately explain FE theory in English.
http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htmHere is an theory that is just as stupid as the Flat Earth theory. Even more stupid? I don't know.What do you think? Tom Bishop should swallow this.It's hilarious. I found a site that claimed that dinosaurs never existed too.
Ridiculous. How do you explain the forces at work? Or the fact that the sun and moon are seen together in some pictures? Absolutely ridiculous!!!
You're stupid.In before teh lock.
We're all jealous of Raist.
Quote from: Commander Saddam on February 14, 2008, 01:14:19 PMYou're stupid.In before teh lock.While technically correct, it still FAILS in intended meaning.
Quote from: Saint Raist on February 15, 2008, 05:42:56 PMQuote from: Commander Saddam on February 14, 2008, 01:14:19 PMYou're stupid.In before teh lock.While technically correct, it still FAILS in intended meaning."In before veclock" would have been funnier but wronger.
Quote from: veclock on February 14, 2008, 01:12:03 PMhttp://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htmHere is an theory that is just as stupid as the Flat Earth theory. Even more stupid? I don't know.What do you think? Tom Bishop should swallow this.It's hilarious. I found a site that claimed that dinosaurs never existed too.http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=18053.0/thread
Time is never wasted when you're wasted all the time
tl;dr
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
The moon is obviously a giant helium balloon. Just try shooting it, it'll burst,
No photographs were ever taken of the moon until the 1850’s. Photographs such as this one, taken in 1852 by John Adams Whipple at the Harvard College Observatory, have been cited by Lunarists as proof of the existence of the moon. But considering the poor quality of the picture, this object could be anything, from an unusually round rock on a dark surface to someone’s bald head. We still require the help of self-appointed "experts" to tell us just what we’re looking at.
Here is an theory that is just as stupid as the .Flat Earth theory Even more stupid? I don't know.
I don't remember anything. Well, I do, but it's really vague. Like I was on drugs the whole time.
No word for moon in English before 1066? Well thats kinda daft, isn't it.
THE EARTH IS ROUND FTW. VIVA LA COLUMBUS!!!!