Doctored Photos

  • 83 Replies
  • 21365 Views
Doctored Photos
« on: November 14, 2007, 10:07:17 PM »
It's claimed that  NASA and who ever else is in on the conspiracy is doctoring all the space photos of Earth.
It would seem to me that the very consistency of the images would negate the "Doctoring " theory. If its been done for many years, by many different people , on many different different machines with different technology as it develops you would HAVE to have inconsistencies.
It would not be possible to get it the same every time .
« Last Edit: November 14, 2007, 10:09:09 PM by Riles »

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2007, 10:13:03 PM »
Ah yes, but you can always look 'back' at your older photos and say "Oh that? That's just an artefact left over from photo processing. You know how technology was back THEN!" or even from another machine as you say. It can all go 'round in circles no matter how many times you say it.

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 10:13:54 PM »
You know...

If these 'photographs' have been taken over many years, by many different people with many different camera rigs with completely different technology as it develops, you would HAVE to have inconsistencies. I mean, honestly, you just couldn't get it the same every time...




Right?

~D-Draw

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 10:17:17 PM »
You know...

If these 'photographs' have been taken over many years, by many different people with many different camera rigs with completely different technology as it develops, you would HAVE to have inconsistencies. I mean, honestly, you just couldn't get it the same every time...




Right?

~D-Draw

Blurs and "fuzzies" would become sharper and clearer over time.  But if you take a picture of the same thing from one year to the next at the same angle with different cameras, it'll still be the same.

Try it!

Tennis ball + 5 cameras (one from the 60s, one from the 70s, one from the 80s, one from the 90s, one from current times)

Take one pic with each.

Isn't it just the same 'ole tennis ball?

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2007, 10:22:49 PM »
Surely, a tennis ball doesn't compare nearly to the complexity of the Earth. What I'm saying is that the fact that one might believe there are no INCONSISTENCIES in sattelite photographs taken over the course of 40 years of the EARTH of all things is just ridiculous. Really, the only reason one might think of making this a point is if they were specifically aiming to prove the flat Earth theory wrong and not caring about the other side (because he obviously wasn't thinking about what was happening with his own theory). Face it, you're going to get inconsistencies in these pictures, and no, I don't mean "a little blur," or even a very large blur. Hell, continents could move in that amount of time. You wouldn't call that an INCONSISTENCY? Because I have reason to believe that's the definition of it.

~D-Draw

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2007, 10:25:28 PM »
Surely, a tennis ball doesn't compare nearly to the complexity of the Earth. What I'm saying is that the fact that one might believe there are no INCONSISTENCIES in sattelite photographs taken over the course of 40 years of the EARTH of all things is just ridiculous. Really, the only reason one might think of making this a point is if they were specifically aiming to prove the flat Earth theory wrong and not caring about the other side (because he obviously wasn't thinking about what was happening with his own theory). Face it, you're going to get inconsistencies in these pictures, and no, I don't mean "a little blur," or even a very large blur. Hell, continents could move in that amount of time. You wouldn't call that an INCONSISTENCY? Because I have reason to believe that's the definition of it.

~D-Draw

...Continents... Move... In fourty years?!  Bwahahahaha!!!   ;D

Come on, diego.  You're supposed to be one of the smart ones.

Don't give me that BS.   ::)  At least come up with a PLAUSIBLE argument.

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2007, 10:28:19 PM »
Um....why are you guys talking about cameras and such? If the Earth is really flat, what pictures are they taking in which to doctor?

Consistency in photos just means that they use the same filters and techniques.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2007, 10:29:51 PM »
Um....why are you guys talking about cameras and such? If the Earth is really flat, what pictures are they taking in which to doctor?

Consistency in photos just means that they use the same filters and techniques.

...Like that!   ;D

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2007, 10:35:17 PM »
Surely, a tennis ball doesn't compare nearly to the complexity of the Earth. What I'm saying is that the fact that one might believe there are no INCONSISTENCIES in sattelite photographs taken over the course of 40 years of the EARTH of all things is just ridiculous. Really, the only reason one might think of making this a point is if they were specifically aiming to prove the flat Earth theory wrong and not caring about the other side (because he obviously wasn't thinking about what was happening with his own theory). Face it, you're going to get inconsistencies in these pictures, and no, I don't mean "a little blur," or even a very large blur. Hell, continents could move in that amount of time. You wouldn't call that an INCONSISTENCY? Because I have reason to believe that's the definition of it.

~D-Draw

...Continents... Move... In fourty years?!  Bwahahahaha!!!   ;D

Come on, diego.  You're supposed to be one of the smart ones.

Don't give me that BS.   ::)  At least come up with a PLAUSIBLE argument.

Sorry, I worded that incorrectly. I didn't mean Africa was going to go meet up with South America for a couple of drinks. But rivers could widen, rifts could, mountains can change height, topography can easily be manipulated by humans or otherwise. Et cetera. Not incredibly obvious, but those are inconsistencies if I've ever seen them.

~D-Draw

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2007, 10:37:30 PM »
Surely, a tennis ball doesn't compare nearly to the complexity of the Earth. What I'm saying is that the fact that one might believe there are no INCONSISTENCIES in sattelite photographs taken over the course of 40 years of the EARTH of all things is just ridiculous. Really, the only reason one might think of making this a point is if they were specifically aiming to prove the flat Earth theory wrong and not caring about the other side (because he obviously wasn't thinking about what was happening with his own theory). Face it, you're going to get inconsistencies in these pictures, and no, I don't mean "a little blur," or even a very large blur. Hell, continents could move in that amount of time. You wouldn't call that an INCONSISTENCY? Because I have reason to believe that's the definition of it.

~D-Draw

...Continents... Move... In fourty years?!  Bwahahahaha!!!   ;D

Come on, diego.  You're supposed to be one of the smart ones.

Don't give me that BS.   ::)  At least come up with a PLAUSIBLE argument.

Sorry, I worded that incorrectly. I didn't mean Africa was going to go meet up with South America for a couple of drinks. But rivers could widen, rifts could, mountains can change height, topography can easily be manipulated by humans or otherwise. Et cetera. Not incredibly obvious, but those are inconsistencies if I've ever seen them.

~D-Draw

Heehehehehe... That made me giggle inside.   ;D

And on the topic: Yes, that would be evidence... But of what?

If inconsistencies arose, would they be evidence for a FE?  For a RE?

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2007, 10:40:58 PM »
Neither. But that was just an example of the possible inconsistencies. The point that I'm arguing against was that the OP implied that there would NOT be any inconsistencies in photographs if the Earth was round, but if the photos were doctored, THEN there WOULD be inconsistencies. I just find that implication absolutely bogus. Basically, this point is null for either side.


~D-Draw

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2007, 11:02:00 PM »
The funny part is that even if there were inconsistencies, they could be attributed to camera issues or even atmospheric issues.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #12 on: November 15, 2007, 12:34:16 AM »
Has anyone from FE ever proven them to be doctored in the first place?

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2007, 01:00:44 AM »
Has anyone from FE ever proven them to be doctored in the first place?

How would you like that done?
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2007, 01:12:03 AM »
Has anyone from FE ever proven them to be doctored in the first place?

How would you like that done?

That's why I'm asking.

EDIT: I mean, then it all goes to no-where at all;
Round earth says the earth is round, comes with pictures.
Flat earth says the earth is flat, says the pictures are fake.
Round earth says no
Flat earth says yes
Round earth says no
Etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.

That's just stupid, amirite?
« Last Edit: November 15, 2007, 01:14:07 AM by MayhemNeutral »

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2007, 01:20:18 AM »
That's just stupid, amirite?

Yes, which is why REers should really just leave pictures out of it.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2007, 01:24:31 AM »
EDIT: I mean, then it all goes to no-where at all;
Round earth says the earth is round, comes with pictures.
Flat earth says the earth is flat, says the pictures are fake.
Round earth says no
Flat earth says yes
Round earth says no
Etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.

That's just stupid, amirite?
Right, that's why people shouldn't get all worked up on the Internets.

?

mick

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2007, 03:26:50 AM »
Everything is a friggin conspiracy theory to you losers.  Shouldn't you all be playing World of Warcraft instead of talking shit.
This is a great place for a laugh.  I can't believe there are people like this walking round in public. FRUITS!!!!

*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10061
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #18 on: November 15, 2007, 06:11:04 AM »
Why are we talking about photography?  His question was why aren't doctored photos filled with inconsistencies.

Everything is a friggin conspiracy theory to you losers.  Shouldn't you all be playing World of Warcraft instead of talking shit.
This is a great place for a laugh.  I can't believe there are people like this walking round in public. FRUITS!!!!

1) 97% of all people here believe the Earth is round.
2) You're not very likely to meet one of the "losers" as you call them since about 3 people here genuinely believe the Earth is flat.
3) World of Warcraft?  Get a life.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17848
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #19 on: November 15, 2007, 09:14:55 AM »
The photos of a Round Earth ARE inconsistent. This has been shown on this forum many times.

The color of continents between shots is not constant, they turn from bright green to a dull brown. The earth emits a glare in tandem with a polished billiard ball in one scene but not another. Clouds have shadows in one image but no others. Et cetera.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2007, 09:19:53 AM by Tom Bishop »

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #20 on: November 15, 2007, 09:49:28 AM »
The photos of a Round Earth ARE inconsistent. This has been shown on this forum many times.



oh, well as long as it's been proven on THIS FORUM.  why not submit some of your breakthroughs to an established journal?  that's what real scientists do...

?

eric bloedow

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #21 on: November 15, 2007, 07:16:44 PM »
Tom, you idiot, you are comparing pictures of DIFFERENT parts of the earth!

of course the earth isn't 100% green or 100% brown! that's caused by the change in SEASONS! or the difference between JUNGLE and DESERT!

of course the glare is not always the same! that's caused by different angles relative to the sun, like the difference between DAWN and NOON!

of course clouds will have different shadows, because clouds MOVE! haven't you ever looked out of your OWN window?!

now here's a link to a genuinely doctored photo:

http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/photos/touristguy.html

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #22 on: November 15, 2007, 08:44:32 PM »
Actually I'm pretty sure he's talking about different shots of the same views of earth.  What led you to think otherwise?  ???
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

eric bloedow

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #23 on: November 15, 2007, 08:55:34 PM »
or maybe he's comparing summer shots to winter shots of the same place, and saying one is fake because there's different amounts of white!

give us some EXAMPLES, Tom! SHOW us some photos and POINT out the differences that you CLAIM are "doctored"!!!!!

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #24 on: November 15, 2007, 09:53:34 PM »
or maybe he's comparing summer shots to winter shots of the same place, and saying one is fake because there's different amounts of white!

give us some EXAMPLES, Tom! SHOW us some photos and POINT out the differences that you CLAIM are "doctored"!!!!!
The funniest thing about your posts is that you keep making them, while claiming people on this forum are idiots and are wasting our time. A tall glass of irony anyone?

*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #25 on: November 16, 2007, 07:27:22 AM »
Waste of time? Is the challenge to provide evidence or the comment on what entertains you more of a waste?  :P
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

?

eric bloedow

Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #26 on: November 16, 2007, 07:52:20 AM »
Tom Bishop is the biggest idiot on these forums!

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #27 on: November 16, 2007, 08:01:25 AM »
Tom Bishop is the biggest idiot on these forums!

So? Ignore him you dipshit.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #28 on: November 16, 2007, 12:23:29 PM »
Tom Bishop is the biggest idiot on these forums!

I think there's a pretty good chance that at this moment you're actually the biggest idiot on these forums.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Doctored Photos
« Reply #29 on: November 16, 2007, 12:29:32 PM »
I think there's a pretty good chance that at this moment you're actually the biggest idiot on these forums.

Hah, well said.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good