« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Stars and FE

  • 32 Replies
  • 6481 Views
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Stars and FE
« on: November 02, 2007, 06:48:09 PM »
I saw something that FAQ and Universal Acceleration 101 didn't explain so here it is: If the earth is accelerating at near light speed then why when I look outside at night I dont see star rushing past me?
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

Trekky0623

  • Official Member
  • 10061
  • +0/-0
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2007, 06:56:31 PM »
Stars accelerate too.

D'oh!
Logged
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2007, 07:22:58 PM »
Quote from: Trekky0623 on November 02, 2007, 06:56:31 PM
Stars accelerate too.

D'oh!

Read Universal Acceleration 101 it says "The Universal Accelerator only affects you if you're standing on the Earth" u can look it up
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

ALASKA

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2007, 07:33:34 PM »
Its a conspiracy. We cant stand on earth. Its an illusion lol
Logged
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2007, 07:36:43 PM »
funny but I want to see FE's response. Bump
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2007, 07:43:21 PM »
stars do not exist in the way you believe they do. They are actually tiny pinpoints in the sky at the tip of the atmosphere, and thus, are accelerated by the Earth.
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2007, 07:48:35 PM »
flat warth theory just gets weirder and weirder
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2007, 07:50:45 PM »
can you disprove this theory?

What with astronomy not being a science, you'll have a hard time...
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
*

dysfunction

  • The Elder Ones
  • 2261
  • +0/-0
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2007, 07:58:10 PM »
Stars are not tiny pinpoints at the sky at the tip of the atmosphere. They are, like the sun, moon, and 'planets', likely separate objects a few thousand miles up. And yes, the UA accelerates them as well, in fact all of the universe as we know it is being accelerated (with the exception of some asteroids and comets, which impact the Earth as it accelerates up to them, explaining meteor impacts).
Logged
the cake is a lie
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2007, 08:08:24 PM »
wait are they are not touching the earth or the UA therefore they cannot be accelerated
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2007, 08:10:21 PM »
if there is any place in the UA 101 that disprove me please link to it. I was too lazy to read all of it
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +1/-0
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2007, 08:14:55 PM »
Quote from: dysfunction on November 02, 2007, 07:58:10 PM
(with the exception of some asteroids and comets, which impact the Earth as it accelerates up to them, explaining meteor impacts).

Well, why can't UA, since its effect is universal, accelerate "some" asteroids and comets? Are they just gonna sit there and wait for the Earth to accelerate towards them? Explain.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2007, 08:22:41 PM »
Quote from: Iskaros on November 02, 2007, 08:08:24 PM
wait are they are not touching the earth or the UA therefore they cannot be accelerated
The UA is accelerating them. 
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #13 on: November 03, 2007, 02:56:35 AM »
So, the UA has Selective Acceleration? (UA, SA)
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #14 on: November 03, 2007, 06:26:47 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 02, 2007, 08:22:41 PM
Quote from: Iskaros on November 02, 2007, 08:08:24 PM
wait are they are not touching the earth or the UA therefore they cannot be accelerated
The UA is accelerating them. 
Wait it says that u have to be standing on earth to be accelerated and last time I checked the FE sun and moon are not on earth
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #15 on: November 03, 2007, 07:15:04 AM »
bump
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14993
  • +0/-0
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #16 on: November 03, 2007, 08:18:09 AM »
Obviously there's more than JUST the stuff on earth feeling the effects.  The stars, sun, and moon are being accelerated by the UA as well.  Stop posting.
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2007, 09:14:50 AM »
It's dark energy.  We know it's there because we can see and feel the effects of the acceleration, but it's still a mystery exactly how it works to keep not only the earth but also everything above it accelerating.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #18 on: November 03, 2007, 09:42:35 AM »
Quote from: Darth Bishop on November 03, 2007, 02:56:35 AM
So, the UA has Selective Acceleration? (UA, SA)
The upper surface of the Earth is left unaffected by the UA due to a type of bow shock effect.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Agamemnon

  • 15
  • +0/-0
  • The One Who Is
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #19 on: November 03, 2007, 12:26:42 PM »
If UA is truly "universal" acceleration, wouldn't we be accelerating at the same pace as earth and therefore not feel any force upon us. :o

I see more of selective acceleration.
Logged
?

eric bloedow

Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2007, 12:42:36 PM »
so if something did go off the edge of earth (an edge NOBODY has ever seen, EVER) it would "fall" AT THE SAME RATE, and actually go nowhere? just float there?

and did you know that astronomers discovered the existence of saturn's moons by watching then PASS IN FRONT OF STARS?

do you also believe the sun, moon, mars, jupiter, etc. are ALL FLAT?

ok, since the moon always shows the same face, that's conceivable, but since anyone with a small telescope can watch Jupiter rotate...

FErs make me think of an old sc-fi story, i think it was "ideas die hard".
in this story, 2 astronauts were on a simulated mission-but didn't know it was simulated-and saw the fake backside of a fake moon.
so one of them was TOTALLY convinced the actual moon is a fake, and nobody could convince him otherwise; even letting him walk though the middle of the fake didn't help!
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2007, 12:44:39 PM »
Whoever said the planets weren't spherical?  ???
« Last Edit: November 03, 2007, 01:11:04 PM by Roundylicious »
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2007, 01:06:07 PM »
Quote from: eric bloedow on November 03, 2007, 12:42:36 PM
but since anyone with a small telescope can watch Jupiter rotate...

What does Jupiter's rotation have to do with the Earth?
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2007, 04:46:13 PM »
FE'ers respond or I will be forced to declare victory
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 18060
  • +15/-12
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2007, 04:50:47 PM »
Quote from: Iskaros on November 03, 2007, 04:46:13 PM
FE'ers respond or I will be forced to declare victory
Responses were given.
Logged
"Once again the apostles of science are found to lack the scientific credentials for their faith. This not an indictment of science; it only shows again that the choice of science over other forms of life is not a scientific choice."
?

SushiTsunami

  • 69
  • +0/-0
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #25 on: November 03, 2007, 04:57:51 PM »
In the omnipotent FAQ, it states that the Earth and rest of the universe are not governed by the same laws.
Logged
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #26 on: November 03, 2007, 07:36:36 PM »
hold on a mintue this is now making even less sense then usual Engineer please explain
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #27 on: November 03, 2007, 09:33:01 PM »
What am I explaining?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Iskaros

  • 70
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Cover up
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #28 on: November 04, 2007, 05:43:47 AM »
Quote from: SushiTsunami on November 03, 2007, 04:57:51 PM
In the omnipotent FAQ, it states that the Earth and rest of the universe are not governed by the same laws.
I'm going to check this, but if true it makes FE even harder to believe
Logged
"Always take an oblique approach" General Flavius Belisarius

I'm a teenager big whoop teenagers can be smart (every once in a million years)
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 18060
  • +15/-12
Re: Stars and FE
« Reply #29 on: November 04, 2007, 10:18:11 AM »
Why? Certain things follow different laws.  For example, small things follow one set, and big things another.
Logged
"Once again the apostles of science are found to lack the scientific credentials for their faith. This not an indictment of science; it only shows again that the choice of science over other forms of life is not a scientific choice."
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »