And where did your spell checker go, it's the second time you write "anomolies"
it's the second time you write "anomolies"
It is well explained and quite certainly not wrong. About incomplete part I don't get it . . . What is wrong? What is missing? What anomalies?
Uh...
Who has ever claimed that its perfect and we know absolutely all about it? But with its anomalies and inconsistencies
You know, remembering a post you wrote earlier today is not a lot to ask. You either agree with the first post and disagree with the second, or vice-versa. A little consistency would be nice.
Ski has presented evidence, and I haven't seen a single one of you offer any substantive criticism of his sources or their work. These are RE scientists, working for RET, and yet you're all just sticking your fingers in your ears and pretending nothing has happened. Nobody has presented evidence of the coriolis effect in this thread. What has been presented is evidence that there are serious anomalies in the RET explanation.
Given that this topic was
supposed to be a demonstration of the Earth's sphericity, I'd say this is another win for FE.