So in response to 40 years worth of claims that the footage was faked, they conveniently "find" slightly better versions? What, did somebody just leave a box of film reels under the wing of a space shuttle or something?
Having a little bit of gravity is like being a little bit pregnant.
Its the same tapes...they just didnt have the computing power back then to view the data in full resolution.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
Quote from: its_amazing on July 01, 2009, 06:48:27 AMIts the same tapes...they just didnt have the computing power back then to view the data in full resolution.Yet they had the computing power to film it, with small enough mass to send it hundreds of megametres away, no less?
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
How much computing power does a black and white analog television camera require?
Quote from: markjo on July 01, 2009, 01:27:41 PMHow much computing power does a black and white analog television camera require? Not much, but they don't capture such high resolution images that we would need a lot of computing power to view the footage.
TV from the MoonThe television camera taken to the lunar surface was a Westinghouse designed and built slow-scan black and white camera with a vertical resolution of 320 lines scanned at 10 frames per second. This camera was chosen because the available bandwidth from the Moon (500kHz) was not sufficient for a standard TV signal.On Earth, the received slow scan signal was converted to a standard TV picture (in this case, the American standard of 525 lines and 30 frames per second) using specially built scan converters. At Goldstone and Honeysuckle, the conversion was done on site. The Parkes slow scan TV signal was sent to the OTC (Overseas Telecommunications Commission) Paddington gateway exchange in Oxford Street, Paddington, in Sydney and converted there.
How comes there's already a camera crew on the moon waiting to film the spacemen?
Quote from: onetrueword on July 03, 2009, 10:55:41 AMHow comes there's already a camera crew on the moon waiting to film the spacemen? What are you talking about?
Quote from: markjo on July 03, 2009, 12:32:37 PMQuote from: onetrueword on July 03, 2009, 10:55:41 AMHow comes there's already a camera crew on the moon waiting to film the spacemen? What are you talking about?Don't you find it strange that the cameras were already set up for them when they got there?
Quote from: onetrueword on July 03, 2009, 12:33:23 PMQuote from: markjo on July 03, 2009, 12:32:37 PMQuote from: onetrueword on July 03, 2009, 10:55:41 AMHow comes there's already a camera crew on the moon waiting to film the spacemen? What are you talking about?Don't you find it strange that the cameras were already set up for them when they got there?Who said that the cameras were already there?
Quote from: markjo on July 03, 2009, 12:36:07 PMQuote from: onetrueword on July 03, 2009, 12:33:23 PMQuote from: markjo on July 03, 2009, 12:32:37 PMQuote from: onetrueword on July 03, 2009, 10:55:41 AMHow comes there's already a camera crew on the moon waiting to film the spacemen? What are you talking about?Don't you find it strange that the cameras were already set up for them when they got there?Who said that the cameras were already there? The footage.
TV cameras used on the Apollo missions (and later Apollo-Soyuz Test Project and Skylab missions) varied in design, with image quality improving significantly with each design. A camera was carried in the Apollo Command Module. For each lunar landing mission, a camera was also placed inside the Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA) in Quad 4 of the Lunar Module (LM) Descent Stage, so it was capable of broadcasting the first steps of the astronauts as they climbed down the ladder of the LM at the start of the first moonwalk/EVA. Afterwards, the camera would be detached from its mount in the MESA, mounted on a tripod and carried away from the LM to show the progress of the EVA.