Theory and execution are entirely different realms.
Well I have measured Trig points and the measurements indicate a Round Earth. So in execution, Round Earth succeeds.
Details please.
Details are meaningless here as it has been made abundantly cleare that no FEer will accept any RE data as every single time we have posted such data, it has been rejected as made up and therefore further proof of the conspiracy.
So no. I will not post data, not because I don't have it, but because it will not be accepted. But if you want the data, you can find it on Cartographic sites (for the US, this would be the USGS sites). And yes, I know that these would be government sites, but what is important is that you can then personally check and verify if the data is correct, or faked. If the Governments were in a conspiracy, why would they post data that would allow the conspiracy to be so easily revealed.
The alternative is that the Method be posted so that if someone want to disprove it, then can check it themselves.
As the method is just Trigonometry to calculate the distances, and then the application of Geometry, this can be verified as being correct (1 + 1 does equal 2 after all).
What you will find is that the distances (over a large enough area) will not be able to be mapped to a flat plane, and if you known Non-Euclidean Geometry, the distances you get will only conform to a sphere.
Now, before people go off saying that their data is faked. Sure it might be, but I have posted the method by which, if you really believe that and want to completely disprove RET, you can. The only down side for you is, that if it produces the results that disprove FET, then you will have a problem.
So you can't claim that I have not posted evidence. I have. I have stated that the data I got conformed to the data supplied by the governments. Not only that, I ahve posted the method by which I got that data, and that you yourself can use to check it. If I was not confident that the data supplied by the governments were correct, I would not have posted that I agree with it (and as it is more accurate and there is a larger amount of it covering a larger area, it is more efficient for me to specify that than post the data I have, as unless you are in the same location as me, the measurements I made, are not verifiable by you), or posted the method by which I got the data so that you can verify it.
Therefore I have, by the conditions needed to be classed as acceptable evidence, I have supplied evidence.