Ghosts

  • 213 Replies
  • 54394 Views
?

Althalus

  • 4062
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #60 on: August 18, 2008, 01:48:38 AM »
If all our actions are predetermined intelligence is meaningless anyway.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #61 on: August 18, 2008, 04:51:29 AM »
If all our actions are predetermined intelligence is meaningless anyway.

This is true. However, it doesn't make any difference to our lives either way, so there's no point getting hung up on it.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

*

Masterchef

  • 3894
  • +0/-0
  • Rabble rabble rabble
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #62 on: August 18, 2008, 01:02:01 PM »
I'll believe in ghosts when you show me one. If you think pictures and videos of ghosts are proof, I will show you "proof" that the United States saved Earth from an alien invasion back in 1996.

*

Saddam Hussein

  • Official Member
  • 35188
  • +1/-0
  • Former President of Iraq
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #63 on: August 18, 2008, 01:31:57 PM »
Ghosts do not exist.

*

Guessed

  • 5376
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #64 on: August 18, 2008, 11:08:18 PM »
NO U!
Is Dino open source?

Quote from: grogberries


?

crazy96863

  • 94
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #65 on: August 18, 2008, 11:24:01 PM »
Whether you are religous or not, there are things out there that are greater than ourselves.
"Greater" in what respect? Intelligence? Mass? Energy? What?

I was refering to things that take a greater understanding than we are currently capable of. Such as: God, Higher Intelligence, Parallel Dimensions, Spirits, and infinite others. We can all argue either way on many of these topics but the truth is, there is no definitive proof as to existance, or lack there of. Lots of credible theory either way though.

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #66 on: August 19, 2008, 07:35:39 AM »
Whether you are religous or not, there are things out there that are greater than ourselves.
"Greater" in what respect? Intelligence? Mass? Energy? What?

I was refering to things that take a greater understanding than we are currently capable of. Such as: God, Higher Intelligence, Parallel Dimensions, Spirits, and infinite others. We can all argue either way on many of these topics but the truth is, there is no definitive proof as to existance, or lack there of. Lots of credible theory either way though.

Using higher intelligence as an example as something greater crazy96863 I think he's completely justified in his belief that there's things greater than himself.

Using the broad definition of "things that we don't yet understand" then I'd agree there's a lot that we don't understand as individuals or as a species. Of course I think it's always better to look for an explanation rather than saying, "Thor causes thunder by whacking things with his hammer."

Question: how can you prove that ghosts/spirits/gods don't exist?

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #67 on: August 19, 2008, 10:24:22 AM »
Here's the way I look at it.  We can only see three demensions.  From what I understand scientists are theorizing that there are actually 10 demensions, 7 of which we cannot see.  Is it not possible that beings are caught in these other demensions and are here with us simutaneously (sp?)?
Now with them being in a higher demension I would assume that they could see us.  Maybe not, but hey it's an idea.  What if they have the power to show themselves in the demensions we are able to see. 
Someone please let me know if this is too far of a stretch.  I just try to look at everything from all possible angles. :-X
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

?

rodeoboy

  • 401
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #68 on: August 19, 2008, 11:11:11 AM »
Here's the way I look at it.  We can only see three demensions.  From what I understand scientists are theorizing that there are actually 10 demensions, 7 of which we cannot see.  Is it not possible that beings are caught in these other demensions and are here with us simutaneously (sp?)?
Now with them being in a higher demension I would assume that they could see us.  Maybe not, but hey it's an idea.  What if they have the power to show themselves in the demensions we are able to see. 
Someone please let me know if this is too far of a stretch.  I just try to look at everything from all possible angles. :-X



don't be dumb
All cats have four legs. My dog has four legs. Therefore my dog is a cat.

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #69 on: August 19, 2008, 11:14:17 AM »
Here's the way I look at it.  We can only see three demensions.  From what I understand scientists are theorizing that there are actually 10 demensions, 7 of which we cannot see.  Is it not possible that beings are caught in these other demensions and are here with us simutaneously (sp?)?
Now with them being in a higher demension I would assume that they could see us.  Maybe not, but hey it's an idea.  What if they have the power to show themselves in the demensions we are able to see. 
Someone please let me know if this is too far of a stretch.  I just try to look at everything from all possible angles. :-X

LOL.  You really are a winner there rodeo.  You have nothing better to say than to insult me?  Obviously, this question wasn't meant for you as you seem to have no intelectual thoughts to add.


don't be dumb
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

?

rodeoboy

  • 401
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #70 on: August 19, 2008, 11:18:59 AM »
Here's the way I look at it.  We can only see three demensions.  From what I understand scientists are theorizing that there are actually 10 demensions, 7 of which we cannot see.  Is it not possible that beings are caught in these other demensions and are here with us simutaneously (sp?)?
Now with them being in a higher demension I would assume that they could see us.  Maybe not, but hey it's an idea.  What if they have the power to show themselves in the demensions we are able to see. 
Someone please let me know if this is too far of a stretch.  I just try to look at everything from all possible angles. :-X

LOL.  You really are a winner there rodeo.  You have nothing better to say than to insult me?  Obviously, this question wasn't meant for you as you seem to have no intelectual thoughts to add.


don't be dumb

Well your perspective is really stupid.... so it is basically calling for a degenerative comment
All cats have four legs. My dog has four legs. Therefore my dog is a cat.

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #71 on: August 19, 2008, 11:25:52 AM »
Here's the way I look at it.  We can only see three demensions.  From what I understand scientists are theorizing that there are actually 10 demensions, 7 of which we cannot see.  Is it not possible that beings are caught in these other demensions and are here with us simutaneously (sp?)?
Now with them being in a higher demension I would assume that they could see us.  Maybe not, but hey it's an idea.  What if they have the power to show themselves in the demensions we are able to see. 
Someone please let me know if this is too far of a stretch.  I just try to look at everything from all possible angles. :-X

LOL.  You really are a winner there rodeo.  You have nothing better to say than to insult me?  Obviously, this question wasn't meant for you as you seem to have no intelectual thoughts to add.


don't be dumb

Well your perspective is really stupid.... so it is basically calling for a degenerative comment
I don't see how my perspective is stupid.  Simply because you don't believe in the possiblity of something that someone else does, doesn't make them dumb.  As far as I can tell, you're the dumb one.  I haven't seen one shred of inteligence come from anything you say here.
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

?

Funbar

  • 20
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #72 on: August 19, 2008, 07:14:54 PM »
...This makes much sense...

Not.

*

Wendy

  • 18427
  • +0/-0
  • I laugh cus you fake
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #73 on: August 20, 2008, 01:04:21 AM »
Here's the way I look at it.  We can only see three demensions.  From what I understand scientists are theorizing that there are actually 10 demensions, 7 of which we cannot see.  Is it not possible that beings are caught in these other demensions and are here with us simutaneously (sp?)?
Now with them being in a higher demension I would assume that they could see us.  Maybe not, but hey it's an idea.  What if they have the power to show themselves in the demensions we are able to see. 
Someone please let me know if this is too far of a stretch.  I just try to look at everything from all possible angles. :-X

LOL.  You really are a winner there rodeo.  You have nothing better to say than to insult me?  Obviously, this question wasn't meant for you as you seem to have no intelectual thoughts to add.


don't be dumb

Well your perspective is really stupid.... so it is basically calling for a degenerative comment
I don't see how my perspective is stupid.  Simply because you don't believe in the possiblity of something that someone else does, doesn't make them dumb.  As far as I can tell, you're the dumb one.  I haven't seen one shred of inteligence come from anything you say here.

Well, he did tell you not to be dumb. To believe in something that you can't understand or explain doesn't make you dumb, but it doesn't make you smart either. Millions, maybe even billions of people, believe in God, but many others look at the possibility of it all being a scam, and try to find evidence for there being a God. There is none, and therefore one comes to the conclusion that he doesn't exist. Now use the same logic for ghosts, and we'll see what you come up with.
Here's an explanation for ya. Lurk moar. Every single point you brought up has been posted, reposted, debated and debunked. There is a search function on this forum, and it is very easy to use.

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #74 on: August 20, 2008, 02:55:20 AM »
Here's the way I look at it.  We can only see three demensions.  From what I understand scientists are theorizing that there are actually 10 demensions, 7 of which we cannot see.

Yes, you may understand that some physicists are theorizing many dimensions but how about understanding that theory before making speculations. Otherwise it's just going to be an argument from ignorance. In other words: don't be dumb.

Also, try "some physicists" rather than "scientists" as when you just say "scientists" it can lead to the misunderstanding that it is a widely accepted theory across all branches of science. Science has many fields and within those fields there can be many different views on many different things.

Is it not possible that beings are caught in these other demensions and are here with us simutaneously (sp?)?

Go and try and understand the theory and what they mean by a "dimension". Also, try and get decent resources for this rather than other people such as yourself who just hear snippets ("ooh 10 dimensions") and think they understand what that means.

Now with them being in a higher demension I would assume that they could see us. Maybe not, but hey it's an idea.

Underpants Gnomes... it's an idea.

In other words: don't be dumb.

Also, try not to make assumptions and actually try and find out. In other words: don't be dumb.

What if they have the power to show themselves in the demensions we are able to see. 
Someone please let me know if this is too far of a stretch.

I really could've just lumped this in together. Go and read the theory: don't be dumb.

I just try to look at everything from all possible angles. :-X

No, you just make speculations from ignorance and think that just because something can be thought of it makes it worthy of discussion.

I think that humans don't have ghosts but dogs do and I think the ghosts of dogs go and take a shit in some people's minds such as yours which causes stupidity. It's an idea.

I hear that in general relativity time is affected by gravity. I figure as manager it is my job to put the weight of the world on people's shoulders so they end up working less hours in a day and I can pay them less money. It's an idea.

I hear that in quantum theory things can be both alive and dead at the same time, therefore I will be immortal as I will always experience myself as the person that against all odds survived. It's an idea.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2008, 02:57:46 AM by Tai Lung »

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #75 on: August 20, 2008, 06:28:24 AM »
LOL.  Geez you guys are tough. I was simply asking what if.  I didn't mean to sound dumb, just asking a question.  I did state that it may be too far of a stretch and I meant to explain to me and correct me where I was incorrect.  I'm always open to learn more about the things that intrest me, including physics.  I'm no genious and I don't presume to be and yes I do agree that I am a bit "ignorant" when it comes to these subjects.  As I stated in another thread my understanding of physics only goes as far as highschool and t.v.  I am intelligent enough to understand but did not have the education to teach me what I should know. 
Also, not knowing about a subject doesn't make you dumb it makes you ignorant.
It's having all the facts and still getting it wrong that makes you dumb.
Obviously, I don't have all the facts and never stated that I did.  The entire post was basically asking for someone to explain it to me.  But if it's too much of a hassel then please, don't bother.  I'm not here to be a pest, I would just like to know.
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

?

rodeoboy

  • 401
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #76 on: August 20, 2008, 06:50:56 AM »
LOL.  Geez you guys are tough. I was simply asking what if.  I didn't mean to sound dumb, just asking a question.  I did state that it may be too far of a stretch and I meant to explain to me and correct me where I was incorrect.  I'm always open to learn more about the things that intrest me, including physics.  I'm no genious and I don't presume to be and yes I do agree that I am a bit "ignorant" when it comes to these subjects.  As I stated in another thread my understanding of physics only goes as far as highschool and t.v.  I am intelligent enough to understand but did not have the education to teach me what I should know. 
Also, not knowing about a subject doesn't make you dumb it makes you ignorant.
It's having all the facts and still getting it wrong that makes you dumb.
Obviously, I don't have all the facts and never stated that I did.  The entire post was basically asking for someone to explain it to me.  But if it's too much of a hassel then please, don't bother.  I'm not here to be a pest, I would just like to know.


If you don't want to be a pest, go away from this site.
All cats have four legs. My dog has four legs. Therefore my dog is a cat.

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #77 on: August 20, 2008, 06:58:03 AM »
LOL.  Geez you guys are tough. I was simply asking what if.  I didn't mean to sound dumb, just asking a question.  I did state that it may be too far of a stretch and I meant to explain to me and correct me where I was incorrect.  I'm always open to learn more about the things that intrest me, including physics.  I'm no genious and I don't presume to be and yes I do agree that I am a bit "ignorant" when it comes to these subjects.  As I stated in another thread my understanding of physics only goes as far as highschool and t.v.  I am intelligent enough to understand but did not have the education to teach me what I should know. 
Also, not knowing about a subject doesn't make you dumb it makes you ignorant.
It's having all the facts and still getting it wrong that makes you dumb.
Obviously, I don't have all the facts and never stated that I did.  The entire post was basically asking for someone to explain it to me.  But if it's too much of a hassel then please, don't bother.  I'm not here to be a pest, I would just like to know.
Why?  For asking a question then trying to explain why I asked the question?  If no one wanted to answer all they had to do was NOT reply. 


If you don't want to be a pest, go away from this site.
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #78 on: August 20, 2008, 08:04:03 AM »
LOL.  Geez you guys are tough. I was simply asking what if.  I didn't mean to sound dumb, just asking a question.  I did state that it may be too far of a stretch and I meant to explain to me and correct me where I was incorrect.  I'm always open to learn more about the things that intrest me, including physics.  I'm no genious and I don't presume to be and yes I do agree that I am a bit "ignorant" when it comes to these subjects.  As I stated in another thread my understanding of physics only goes as far as highschool and t.v.  I am intelligent enough to understand but did not have the education to teach me what I should know. 
Also, not knowing about a subject doesn't make you dumb it makes you ignorant.
It's having all the facts and still getting it wrong that makes you dumb.
Obviously, I don't have all the facts and never stated that I did.  The entire post was basically asking for someone to explain it to me.  But if it's too much of a hassel then please, don't bother.  I'm not here to be a pest, I would just like to know.

I totally agree that there's a difference between being dumb and being ignorant and I think you were being dumb. It's not because you were ignorant of the theory, it's because you went and made speculations about it without having a single clue what it's about - that's dumb (much like my other examples).

Here's a quick question: can you explain to me why some physicists think there's 10 dimensions?

If the question is no then I really, really, really want you to ask how do you justify referencing that theory with your speculations? Why did you not just say, "Isn't it possible that there's another dimension that ghosts could exist in?"

More over what do you hope to obtain by asking such a question? Do you think that just because you have an idea it makes it reasonable and worth discussing?

What did you think about my idea involving ghost dogs?

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #79 on: August 20, 2008, 09:15:10 AM »
LOL.  Geez you guys are tough. I was simply asking what if.  I didn't mean to sound dumb, just asking a question.  I did state that it may be too far of a stretch and I meant to explain to me and correct me where I was incorrect.  I'm always open to learn more about the things that intrest me, including physics.  I'm no genious and I don't presume to be and yes I do agree that I am a bit "ignorant" when it comes to these subjects.  As I stated in another thread my understanding of physics only goes as far as highschool and t.v.  I am intelligent enough to understand but did not have the education to teach me what I should know. 
Also, not knowing about a subject doesn't make you dumb it makes you ignorant.
It's having all the facts and still getting it wrong that makes you dumb.
Obviously, I don't have all the facts and never stated that I did.  The entire post was basically asking for someone to explain it to me.  But if it's too much of a hassel then please, don't bother.  I'm not here to be a pest, I would just like to know.

I totally agree that there's a difference between being dumb and being ignorant and I think you were being dumb. It's not because you were ignorant of the theory, it's because you went and made speculations about it without having a single clue what it's about - that's dumb (much like my other examples).

Here's a quick question: can you explain to me why some physicists think there's 10 dimensions?

If the question is no then I really, really, really want you to ask how do you justify referencing that theory with your speculations? Why did you not just say, "Isn't it possible that there's another dimension that ghosts could exist in?"

More over what do you hope to obtain by asking such a question? Do you think that just because you have an idea it makes it reasonable and worth discussing?

What did you think about my idea involving ghost dogs?

Ok.  I agree that I should have phrased my question differently.  So I'll ask.  Isn't it possible that there is another dimension that ghosts could exist in?  That's exactly what I wanted to know.  Nothing more. I only brought up the "10 Dimensions" because I had heard someone talk about it before.  I never said I fully understood it.  I only made an assumption from the information I had.  I don't go around pretending to know everything that I talk about.  I like to talk about it because talking about it helps me understand it.  If I don't then I just go around not knowing anything.  It's called learning.
As for Ghost Dogs...That's really nice I'm glad your way of explanation has to include insulting the person who asked a question.  Really, why do you feel the need to call me stupid?  I'm not incapable of learning.  As I stated earlier I can understand it as long as it's explained to me.  So please, if you know so much about it, explain. Otherwise, there's no point in you even responding to my post.
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #80 on: August 20, 2008, 09:40:59 AM »
Ok.  I agree that I should have phrased my question differently.  So I'll ask.  Isn't it possible that there is another dimension that ghosts could exist in?  That's exactly what I wanted to know.  Nothing more. I only brought up the "10 Dimensions" because I had heard someone talk about it before.  I never said I fully understood it.  I only made an assumption from the information I had.  I don't go around pretending to know everything that I talk about.  I like to talk about it because talking about it helps me understand it.  If I don't then I just go around not knowing anything.  It's called learning.
As for Ghost Dogs...That's really nice I'm glad your way of explanation has to include insulting the person who asked a question.  Really, why do you feel the need to call me stupid?  I'm not incapable of learning.  As I stated earlier I can understand it as long as it's explained to me.  So please, if you know so much about it, explain. Otherwise, there's no point in you even responding to my post.

I certainly am glad that you stopped trying to muster up any validity to your idea by tacking it on to some scientific theory (kudos for using string theory, it's usually quantum theory that cops all the kooks). But unfortunately you're question's still useless, what do you hope to achieve by it? What do you define as a possiblity and what do you define as an impossibility. Do you see something as possible just because there's nothing that says it couldn't happen?

Isn't it possible that there's actually beings that exist in our very own dimension that we cannot see because "visible" light passes straight through them and we cannot hear them because they use extremely high frequency noises and that the only evidence of them is how they fill people's brains with junk?

I think the main thing I want to stress here is what does establishing something as a "possibility" achieve in your mind?

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #81 on: August 20, 2008, 10:01:02 AM »
I certainly am glad that you stopped trying to muster up any validity to your idea by tacking it on to some scientific theory (kudos for using string theory, it's usually quantum theory that cops all the kooks). But unfortunately you're question's still useless, what do you hope to achieve by it? What do you define as a possiblity and what do you define as an impossibility. Do you see something as possible just because there's nothing that says it couldn't happen?

Isn't it possible that there's actually beings that exist in our very own dimension that we cannot see because "visible" light passes straight through them and we cannot hear them because they use extremely high frequency noises and that the only evidence of them is how they fill people's brains with junk?

I think the main thing I want to stress here is what does establishing something as a "possibility" achieve in your mind?

Good question, and thank you for backing off the insults. 

I guess you could say I believe that nothing is impossible but I do believe many things are improbable.  I guess I would like to know what other people think of the possibility.  Is it something they can give a little push to by some form of evidence or is it something they think no evidence exists for?  Do they believe all evidence found is fraud or simply a symptom of so called "insanity"?  I like to ask these questions just for the general purpose of knowing where most people stand on the subject.  I belive it's possible and slightly probable that ghosts do, infact, exist but I have no evidence to back it up.  Therefore, I don't know if they exist but I think they could and probably do. 

I saw something once that could not be explained except by a "sleeping disorder" that I have never officially been diagnosed with.  I had a doctor tell me it was stress and another tell me it was all in my imagination.  As far as I know I'm pretty good at keeping my imagination and realities seperate.  This was the only case I'd ever witnessed something like that and I don't understand it and would very much like to.  I guess that's the real reason I asked the question.  I'm trying to come up with answers for why I saw what I saw.  So far no one has given me anything I think is worth considering.  The closest was the sleeping disorder (sleep paralysis) idea.  I've had problems in the past and have seen and heard things that weren't there with my eyes wide open.  The only problem is I knew I was projecting my dreams into my room but in the other case I don't feel that way.  I don't know.  Maybe it's a case of I only hear what I want to because I think the idea of something else is so much more interesting.
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #82 on: August 20, 2008, 10:24:35 AM »
I guess you could say I believe that nothing is impossible but I do believe many things are improbable.  I guess I would like to know what other people think of the possibility.  Is it something they can give a little push to by some form of evidence or is it something they think no evidence exists for?  Do they believe all evidence found is fraud or simply a symptom of so called "insanity"?  I like to ask these questions just for the general purpose of knowing where most people stand on the subject.  I belive it's possible and slightly probable that ghosts do, infact, exist but I have no evidence to back it up.  Therefore, I don't know if they exist but I think they could and probably do.

I saw something once that could not be explained except by a "sleeping disorder" that I have never officially been diagnosed with.  I had a doctor tell me it was stress and another tell me it was all in my imagination.  As far as I know I'm pretty good at keeping my imagination and realities seperate.  This was the only case I'd ever witnessed something like that and I don't understand it and would very much like to.  I guess that's the real reason I asked the question.  I'm trying to come up with answers for why I saw what I saw.  So far no one has given me anything I think is worth considering.  The closest was the sleeping disorder (sleep paralysis) idea.  I've had problems in the past and have seen and heard things that weren't there with my eyes wide open.  The only problem is I knew I was projecting my dreams into my room but in the other case I don't feel that way.  I don't know.  Maybe it's a case of I only hear what I want to because I think the idea of something else is so much more interesting.

Right, first of all you do have evidence (no doubt people will try and argue with me and say that you don't). That experience is evidence... of something. It very well could be that that it's evidence that you're nuts but I'm sure there's many other hypotheses we could generate that could explain the phenomenon (lets see: ghosts, angels, transdimensional aliens, god, the devil, your mind developing psychic powers - was there anything in particular that made you think it's ghosts?). A lot of these hypotheses could be seen to be "possible" but generally aren't that testable.

I think though you hit the hammer on the head when you said, "...I think the idea of something else is so much more interesting." I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that even without these experiences and no other evidence you'd think ghosts "probably" exist. I reckon you just like to have fun with your imagination and come up with "possibilities" - I do too and sometimes even write stories about some of the ideas (though I don't tend to believe in them).

If what I've said has been fairly accurate I'd say you'd have a lot of fun on these forums arguing from a FE perspective (you could come up with a complete history of the conspiracy, a better motivation and loads of things).
« Last Edit: August 20, 2008, 10:26:39 AM by Tai Lung »

?

Moonlit

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 6059
  • +0/-0
  • The Rebound
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #83 on: August 20, 2008, 11:00:28 AM »
Right, first of all you do have evidence (no doubt people will try and argue with me and say that you don't). That experience is evidence... of something. It very well could be that that it's evidence that you're nuts but I'm sure there's many other hypotheses we could generate that could explain the phenomenon (lets see: ghosts, angels, transdimensional aliens, god, the devil, your mind developing psychic powers - was there anything in particular that made you think it's ghosts?). A lot of these hypotheses could be seen to be "possible" but generally aren't that testable.

I think though you hit the hammer on the head when you said, "...I think the idea of something else is so much more interesting." I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that even without these experiences and no other evidence you'd think ghosts "probably" exist. I reckon you just like to have fun with your imagination and come up with "possibilities" - I do too and sometimes even write stories about some of the ideas (though I don't tend to believe in them).

If what I've said has been fairly accurate I'd say you'd have a lot of fun on these forums arguing from a FE perspective (you could come up with a complete history of the conspiracy, a better motivation and loads of things).

Well, I like to think I'm not nuts so lets say that's not the case just for the sake of my family.  :-X LOL

As for why I chose ghosts.  I don't know really.  It was the first thing that had popped into my mind.  My mother and aunt had both witnessed things in the home that were unexplainable.  In all three cases we were around 9 or 10 years old and have had trouble convincing people that we aren't lying.  I have no reason to lie about it unless I enjoy being ridiculed.  And I only believe in ghosts because of the evidence that is out there.  Otherwise, I'd say it's a crazy idea.  If no one had an experience then why would I believe it.  Of course, people have said that they have had experiences with "God" and I still don't believe he/it exists.  But, that's another thought for a different thread.

As far as arguing from the FE perspective, well that would probably be a lot of fun.  But, I don't want to sound like I believe it when I truthfully don't.  At least I don't believe it yet.  I think once again that it's possible, but improbable.
You think that a photograph is indisputable evidence?  Would you like me to show you a photograph of Barack Obama having sex with a gorilla?

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #84 on: August 20, 2008, 03:01:51 PM »
Well, I like to think I'm not nuts so lets say that's not the case just for the sake of my family.  :-X LOL

As for why I chose ghosts.  I don't know really.  It was the first thing that had popped into my mind.  My mother and aunt had both witnessed things in the home that were unexplainable.  In all three cases we were around 9 or 10 years old and have had trouble convincing people that we aren't lying.  I have no reason to lie about it unless I enjoy being ridiculed.  And I only believe in ghosts because of the evidence that is out there.  Otherwise, I'd say it's a crazy idea.  If no one had an experience then why would I believe it.  Of course, people have said that they have had experiences with "God" and I still don't believe he/it exists.  But, that's another thought for a different thread.

As far as arguing from the FE perspective, well that would probably be a lot of fun.  But, I don't want to sound like I believe it when I truthfully don't.  At least I don't believe it yet.  I think once again that it's possible, but improbable.


Mother... aunt... you know some insanity is hereditary... :D

I highlighted unexplainable because that's a very strong word to use for soembody who's not omniscient. Not only this but you're using ghosts to explain the experiences (and you don't know why really) which contradicts your statement that the experience was unexplainable.

I think that's the last I'll say on the matter otherwise I'll just end up repeating myself.

?

crazy96863

  • 94
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #85 on: August 25, 2008, 12:29:46 AM »
Whether you are religous or not, there are things out there that are greater than ourselves.
"Greater" in what respect? Intelligence? Mass? Energy? What?

I was refering to things that take a greater understanding than we are currently capable of. Such as: God, Higher Intelligence, Parallel Dimensions, Spirits, and infinite others. We can all argue either way on many of these topics but the truth is, there is no definitive proof as to existance, or lack there of. Lots of credible theory either way though.

Using higher intelligence as an example as something greater crazy96863 I think he's completely justified in his belief that there's things greater than himself.

Using the broad definition of "things that we don't yet understand" then I'd agree there's a lot that we don't understand as individuals or as a species. Of course I think it's always better to look for an explanation rather than saying, "Thor causes thunder by whacking things with his hammer."

Question: how can you prove that ghosts/spirits/gods don't exist?

Can't prove it either way. Kinda like bigfoot and aliens I guess.

*

Sean O'Grady

  • 625
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Theorist
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #86 on: August 25, 2008, 04:39:07 AM »
Can't prove it either way. Kinda like bigfoot and aliens I guess.

Really? You can't prove these things either way?

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #87 on: August 25, 2008, 04:48:10 PM »
Can't prove it either way. Kinda like bigfoot and aliens I guess.

The dead body of Bigfoot or an alien can be pretty convincing.  Unless you're going on theoretics and actually 'proving' something, in which case there are many more things you can't prove.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #88 on: August 26, 2008, 12:25:12 PM »
Really? You can't prove these things either way?

[thread derailment]

BTW I just watched Kung Fu Panda again on a flight from Hawaii to Atlanta.  My favorite line "But he's a panda, you're a panda, what are you going to do big guy, sit on me?"  Funny stuff.

[/thread derailment]

Please continue with the topic of this thread already in progress.

?

rodeoboy

  • 401
  • +0/-0
Re: Ghosts
« Reply #89 on: August 26, 2008, 12:50:46 PM »
Really? You can't prove these things either way?

[thread derailment]

BTW I just watched Kung Fu Panda again on a flight from Hawaii to Atlanta.  My favorite line "But he's a panda, you're a panda, what are you going to do big guy, sit on me?"  Funny stuff.

[/thread derailment]

Please continue with the topic of this thread already in progress.


best bit is when he says "ouch, my tenders" or something along those lines...
All cats have four legs. My dog has four legs. Therefore my dog is a cat.